Balada Al Mubaarok https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam <p><strong data-start="0" data-end="29" data-is-only-node="">Balada Al Mubarak</strong> is a reputable scholarly journal dedicated to in-depth studies in the fields of <strong data-start="110" data-end="118">fiqh</strong> and <strong data-start="123" data-end="139">uṣūl al-fiqh</strong>. It publishes academic essays that explore both classical and contemporary issues in Islamic law from normative, methodological, and applicative perspectives. Adopting an interdisciplinary approach and critical analysis of authoritative Islamic sources, the journal serves as a platform for scholarly dialogue among researchers, scholars, and academics committed to developing Islamic legal thought that responds to the challenges of the modern era. All articles undergo a rigorous selection and peer-review process to ensure academic quality and integrity.</p> en-US <p>Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:</p> <ol type="a"> <li>Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a <a href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0" target="_new">Creative Commons Attribution License</a> that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.</li> <li>Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.</li> <li>Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See <a href="http://opcit.eprints.org/oacitation-biblio.html" target="_new">The Effect of Open Access</a>).</li> </ol> adminojsbalada@almubaarokmanggisan.ponpes.id (Fajarman ) adminojsbalada@almubaarokmanggisan.ponpes.id (Fajarman ) Sat, 14 Jun 2025 09:57:41 +0700 OJS 3.3.0.11 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss 60 Ta'zir and Restorative Justice: Alternative Punishments from an Islamic Perspective https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/13 <p>This study examines ta'zir punishment as a form of punishment in Islamic law that is adaptive and upholds humanitarian values. The study was conducted using a qualitative, descriptive, and normative approach, through a literature review of primary sources such as the Qur'an, Hadith, and works of previous scholars, supported by contemporary academic literature. The findings show that ta'zir punishment is imposed on violations that are not expressly regulated in the holy text, with the determination of sanctions left to the judge's consideration through ijtihad, referring to justice, public interest, and social context. This concept emphasizes the importance of personalizing punishment, orientation towards the recovery of the perpetrator, and balance between action and sanctions, so it is in line with the restorative justice approach in the current criminal system. The conclusion of this study confirms that the principles of ta'zir can inspire modern criminal law reform, especially for cases that require non-punitive handling, as long as they adhere to the principles of legality and respect for human rights.</p> Riva Mutiara, Aprilia Yoshinta Putri, Muhammad Rivan Viawan Copyright (c) 2025 Riva Mutiara, Aprilia Yoshinta Putri, Muhammad Rivan Viawan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/13 Sat, 14 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Virtual Zina in the Perspective of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah: Reconstructing the Islamic Criminal Law Approach to Contemporary Sexual Crimes https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/35 <p>This study aims to reconstruct the Islamic criminal law approach to adultery from the perspective of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah in order to do justice to the complexity of contemporary sexual offenses. The classical fiqh approach, which is based on textual and normative principles, is considered insufficient to address non-consensual forms of sexual violence such as rape, harassment, and digital exploitation. Using a qualitative method based on literature review and maqāṣidī analysis, this study combines authoritative sources of Sharia with modern criminological literature. The results of the study show that the maqāṣidī approach allows for a reinterpretation of the boundaries of zina, the mechanisms of proof, and the types of punishments that are better adapted to the principles of protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs), reason (ḥifẓ al-‘aql), and honor (ḥifẓ al-‘irdh). However, methodological challenges and resistance from traditional fiqh authorities pose obstacles to the operationalization of this approach. The limitations of this study lie in its conceptual nature without empirical investigation of its application in Muslim countries. These findings make a normative contribution to strengthening victim protection and promote epistemological renewal in Islamic criminal law. The novelty of this research lies in its systematic approach to integrating maqāṣid al-sharīʿah into the redesign of adultery offenses to reflect the reality of modern sexual crimes.</p> Muhammad Sholahul Umam, Sakila Putri Zahwa Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Sholahul Umam, Sakila Putri Zahwa http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/35 Sat, 14 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Conceptualizing Democracy in the Classical Islamic Tradition: A Turāth Literature Analysis on Sovereignty and Consultation https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/8 <p>This study explores the concept of a democratic system of governance from an Islamic perspective through a critical examination of <em>turāth</em> (Islamic classical heritage) literature. While democracy centered on the principle of popular sovereignty has been widely adopted globally, including in Indonesia, its compatibility with Islam remains a subject of debate. Certain Muslim groups argue that democracy contradicts Islamic teachings and advocate for alternatives such as the implementation of sharīʿah law or the re-establishment of the caliphate. Employing a qualitative, descriptive-analytical approach through library research, this study draws primarily on the works of classical scholars (<em>salaf</em>) and relevant literature. Using content and discourse analysis, the research reinterprets foundational Islamic concepts in light of contemporary democratic ideals. Findings suggest that key democratic principles such as representative decision-making and public welfare (<em>maṣlaḥah</em>) are not only compatible with Islamic governance but also reflected in the Islamic practice of <em>shūrā</em> (consultation). In Islam, <em>shūrā</em> involves participatory deliberation by competent and trustworthy representatives of the community. Thus, this study concludes that democracy, when framed through Islamic ethical values, holds significant potential for promoting justice, welfare, and accountable governance in Muslim societies.</p> Nasrul Arifin Copyright (c) 2025 Nasrul Arifin http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/8 Sat, 14 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0700 Legal Sanctions for Bestiality Offenders in Indonesia: A Study Based on Fiqh al-Jināyāt https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/9 <p>Bestiality is a form of sexual deviance that has seen increasing prevalence, particularly in Indonesia, since the early 2000s. Despite its alarming nature, the Indonesian legal system lacks specific regulations addressing this issue. In contrast, Islamic criminal jurisprudence (<em>fiqh al-jināyāt</em>) discusses such behaviour under the scope of discretionary punishment (<em>taʿzīr</em>). This study aims to analyze legal responses to bestiality in Indonesia through the lens of fiqh al-jināyāt. Employing a qualitative library research method, the study draws on classical and contemporary Islamic legal sources and scholarly opinions. It adopts the legal maxim <em>al-ḍarar yuzāl</em> (harm must be eliminated) as an analytical framework to interpret the application of taʿzīr to cases of bestiality. The findings reveal a significant discrepancy between Indonesia's legal treatment of bestiality and the normative provisions found in Islamic criminal law. While fiqh al-jināyāt provides a basis for firm punitive measures, Indonesian laws often address such acts merely as minor animal abuse, resulting in inadequate deterrent effects. This gap highlights the urgent need for educational programs to raise public awareness about the dangers of bestiality and to promote an understanding of healthy sexual behaviour. Moreover, strengthening moral and ethical norms in society is essential to prevent the recurrence of such deviant acts.</p> Arif Fathurrozi, Emes Dewi Kholilah Copyright (c) 2025 Arif Fathurrozi, Emes Dewi Kholilah http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 https://ojs.ma-almubaarok.ac.id/index.php/bam/article/view/9 Sat, 14 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0700